- Range
- 0 to 150 mm, 0 to 200 mm and 0 to 300 mm
- Resolution
- 0.01 mm, displayed directly
- Accuracy
- Stated as plus or minus 0.03 mm
- Display
- Liquid crystal with LED backlight; 1.5 inch on the classic version and 2.2 inch on the large-screen version
- Units
- Metric and inch, switched at the keypad with automatic conversion
- Functions
- On and off by a long press, zero at any position, unit change and backlight
- Measurement modes
- Outside, inside, depth and step from one instrument
- Construction
- Stainless steel beam with aluminium core ends and hardened measuring jaws
- Protection
- IP54 on the waterproof version only; the other versions carry no stated ingress rating
- Battery
- 1.5 V or 3 V button cell, with an automatic power-off module
A caliper measures the four things that most workshop dimensions come down to: an outside width, an inside bore, a depth and a step. That one instrument covers all four is the reason it sits in every tool crib, and the reason the digital version displaced the vernier is not accuracy but reading time. The scale is read by the instrument and displayed as a number, so the operator spends attention on the part rather than on finding the line that coincides.
What follows from that is a shift in what the instrument is for. A caliper with an encoder is not just a faster vernier; it is a comparator that can be zeroed anywhere, which changes the way a batch of parts is checked.
Product overview
The instrument is offered in three ranges - 150, 200 and 300 mm - and in three versions distinguished by screen size and by a protection rating. A 0.01 mm resolution is common to all of them, and so is the stated accuracy of plus or minus 0.03 mm.
The range is the first thing to settle, because it sets the physical size of the tool rather than only what it can measure. A 300 mm caliper is 391 mm long and weighs 275 g, which is a different instrument in the hand from the 236 mm, 200 g version at 150 mm. The version then follows from where the tool is used: the IP54 rating exists for work where coolant or dust would otherwise reach the slider, and the material is explicit that the other versions are not rated.
How the measurement is made
Inside the beam a track of capacitive elements carries a fixed pattern, and the frame that slides along it senses the change in capacitance as it moves. From that the electronics derive a position and display it as a number. Because the encoder reads position rather than counting turns, the reading is available immediately on opening the jaws, and the zero can be moved to any point along the travel.
The jaws themselves are conventional: two for outside measurement, two smaller ones for inside, a narrow rod for depth and a shoulder for steps. The accuracy of the instrument rests on the squareness and flatness of those faces and on the rigidity of the frame, not on the display, which is why a caliper whose faces have worn or been nicked will read consistently but wrongly.
How to select the right caliper
Work backwards from the dimension and the tolerance. The range has to cover the largest dimension to be measured with the jaws still on the beam, and the tolerance decides whether a caliper is the right instrument at all: with a stated accuracy of plus or minus 0.03 mm, dimensions held tighter than that need a micrometer.
Then settle the version. If the tool stays on a bench, the classic form is enough; if it is used at a machine where coolant flows, the IP54 version is the one to specify, because the encoder rather than the jaws is what suffers. Only after those two questions is the screen size worth deciding, and it is a question of where the reading has to be legible rather than of capability.
Measurement limitations and selection considerations
A caliper measures a distance between two faces in contact with the part, so it is only as good as the contact. A burr, a film of oil, a part that is not clean or a jaw pressed on at an angle all enter the reading, and none of them is visible on the display. Measuring the same point twice is the habit that catches these, since a caliper that is tipped will generally not repeat.
Two figures a buyer would normally ask for are not in the material: the repeatability that accompanies the stated accuracy, and the temperature over which the accuracy holds. A steel beam changes length with temperature, and on a 300 mm instrument that effect is a real part of the uncertainty, so the page states that the figure is missing rather than implying a precision the material does not support.
Every value below is taken from source documentation. Where a parameter is not stated in the available material it is marked as information required rather than estimated.