- AC withstand
- 0 to 5 kV, up to 40 mA
- DC withstand
- 0 to 6 kV, up to 9999 μA
- Insulation resistance
- 100 to 1000 V DC, 1 to 9999 MΩ
- Ground bond
- 3 to 40 A, 0 to 600 mΩ, on 7440 only
- Program memory
- 50 groups of eight steps
- Display
- 20 × 2 cm dot matrix OLED
- Arc detection
- Nine sensitivity levels
- Scanner
- One matrix scanner built in, one more connectable; H.V × 4 and H.V × 8 optional
- Interface
- PLC test and reset inputs, pass, fail and processing outputs, RS232
- Body
- 432 × 147 × 500 mm and 22 kg on the drawing for 7440
A single safety analyser is bought for a reason that is rarely written on a specification sheet: the product under test should not have to be unplugged, moved and re-connected between three instruments. The value of a combined unit is the sequence it can run without an operator in the middle of it.
Product overview
Four models sit in one body. The top model runs an alternating withstand test, a direct withstand test, an insulation resistance test and a ground bond test. The other three drop the bond output and keep the rest, and two of them cap the alternating leakage current at a lower figure than the other two.
The controls are arranged for sequence entry rather than for a single measurement: function keys down the left of the keypad select the test, a numeric block enters the values, and the display shows the step, the setpoint and the measured value together. The rear panel carries the high voltage output, the scanner connections, a serial port, the remote control connector and an input for a barcode reader.
How the compliance tester works
Each function applies a quantity and judges the response. In the alternating withstand test a sine wave is raised over a programmed rise time to the set voltage and held for the test time, while the current through the item is compared with an upper and a lower limit. Exceeding the upper limit is a breakdown; falling below the lower limit usually means the item is not connected. The direct test does the same with a rectified output, and the ripple figure is quoted at full load because that is where it is worst.
Insulation resistance is measured at a lower direct voltage, and the reading is taken after a delay because the current through good insulation keeps falling for a while after the voltage is applied. The material specifies the accuracy in two bands, above and below the middle of the voltage range, which reflects that behaviour rather than a change in the instrument.
The bond test is a different measurement in the same box. A low alternating voltage drives a heavy current through the protective conductor, the drop across it is measured, and the resistance is derived and compared with limits that change with the current segment. A zeroing step removes the resistance of the leads first, which matters because on a bond of a few milliohms the leads can be the larger part of the reading.
How to select the right configuration
The first question is whether a bond test is required at all. It is the only function that separates the top model from the rest, and it cannot be added later, so a product standard that calls for it decides the model outright.
The second is the leakage ceiling. Two models stop at the lower figure and two reach the higher one, and the figure has to come from the product standard rather than from a preference for headroom.
The third is the fixture. A product with several test points is impractical to test one lead at a time, and the scanner interface is what turns the instrument into a sequencer. Count the points before choosing the scanner, and remember that one scanner is already inside the instrument.
The fourth is how programs are recalled. Fifty groups with a name stored against each is enough for a varied bench, but if operators select by product label, the barcode input at the rear is the feature that decides the configuration.
Measurement limitations and selection considerations
The instrument judges against limits; it does not characterise insulation. Where the breakdown voltage itself is the quantity of interest, a tester with a ramped output and a recorded curve is the right instrument, and a pass or fail unit will only report that breakdown happened somewhere above the limit.
Leakage measurement includes everything connected across the output, including the fixture, the scanner and the leads. On a product with very low leakage that residual current can be a large fraction of the reading, which is why the lower limit has to be set with the fixture in place and characterised, not on an open bench.
The bond function belongs to one model only, and its current is capped at a figure that may be below what a particular standard asks for. The material mentions a higher current on request, which means the requirement has to be raised at the order stage rather than assumed from the model table.
Finally, combining functions in one box means one failure stops the sequence. That is usually what a production test wants, but a laboratory that needs to investigate which test failed, and by how much, may prefer separate instruments with independent records.
Every value below is taken from source documentation. Where a parameter is not stated in the available material it is marked as information required rather than estimated.