- Model
- TT220 / TT230 / TT260 and the split-probe F and N series
- Measuring principle
- Magnetic induction on ferromagnetic substrates, eddy current on non-ferrous substrates, selected automatically by the probe fitted
- Measuring range
- 0 to 1250 µm with the standard F1 or N1 probe; 0 to 400 µm with F400; 0 to 5000 µm with F5; 0 to 10000 µm with F10; 0 to 2000 µm on the integral TT220
- Resolution
- 0.1 µm below 100 µm; 10 µm on the long-range F10 probe; 1 µm above 100 µm on the integral model
- Indication error
- ±(1 to 3) % of reading ±1 µm after two-point calibration; ±(3 % of reading ±1 µm) after one-point calibration
- Minimum substrate thickness
- 0.5 mm on a ferromagnetic substrate with F1 and 0.3 mm on a non-ferrous substrate with N1
- Minimum measuring area
- 7 mm diameter with F1 and 5 mm diameter with N1
- Storage and statistics
- 500 readings in five groups of 100, with mean, maximum, minimum, count and standard deviation
- Supply and runtime
- Two AA cells, stated as over 200 hours of operation with the backlight off
- Languages
- Chinese and English, offered on some models in the range
A coating thickness gauge exists because the alternative is a knife, a microscope and a scrapped part. Paint, plating, powder coat and anodising are all specified as a thickness, and all of them have to be checked on the delivered part rather than on a coupon - which means the measurement has to leave the part intact.
The instrument does that by measuring the layer from above, and what makes it more than a single-purpose tool is that the same body will do it on steel and on aluminium, provided the substrate is recognised for what it is.
What the instrument is
A probe and a body. The probe carries a coil and measures a property of the field between itself and the substrate; the body supplies the display, the calibration and the statistics. Between them they implement two different methods, and the probe in use is what decides which one is applied.
The range in this material is broad: a split body with a cable-mounted probe, the same arrangement in a metal housing, a version that switches between steel and aluminium automatically, a long-range version for thick coatings, and a compact integral instrument for routine work on flat parts. They share the probe family and the measurement principle and differ in what they are pointed at.
The two methods, and why the substrate decides
The magnetic induction method energises a coil and measures the reluctance of the path between the probe and a ferromagnetic substrate. The coating is a gap in that path, so the reading is essentially a distance across the layer. It requires the substrate to be genuinely ferromagnetic and the coating to be genuinely non-magnetic - which is why nickel plating is the awkward case, since a nickel layer can act as part of the substrate.
The eddy current method drives an alternating field into a conductive substrate and measures the change in impedance caused by eddy currents flowing in it. Because the standoff affects that field, the same coil becomes a thickness reading once the substrate is known. It is the method for aluminium, copper, brass and austenitic stainless steel, where a magnetic gauge reads nothing useful at all.
A gauge carrying both identifies the probe automatically and applies the matching method, which removes the most common way of getting a wrong answer: using the right instrument on the wrong substrate.
Calibration, and why two points beat one
Both methods are relative and are calibrated rather than absolute. Zeroing on the bare substrate removes the offset - the error from the probe not reading exactly zero on the substrate itself. Adding a foil of known thickness and calibrating against it corrects the gain as well.
That is the whole difference between the material’s two error figures. One-point calibration is quoted at ±(3 % of reading + 1 µm) and two-point at ±(1 to 3) % of reading ±1 µm. Practically, a one-point calibration is at its best near the thickness at which it was zeroed and drifts further away from it, so work near the ends of a probe’s range is done with two points.
The conditions that bias the reading
The field spreads sideways as well as downwards, and everything that changes how much material surrounds the measurement point changes the reading a little. Curvature bends the field, an edge cuts it off, and a substrate thinner than the method expects stops behaving as an infinite body. The material gives a figure for each of these per probe: a minimum area of 7 mm diameter for F1 and 5 mm for N1, a minimum radius of 1.5 mm convex for F1 and 3 mm for N1, and a minimum substrate thickness of 0.5 mm on steel and 0.3 mm on aluminium.
None of these announces itself when it is violated. The number simply drifts, and it drifts in the direction that makes a thin coating look acceptable. That is why the conditions are checked against the part before the probe is chosen rather than after a reading looks wrong.
Measurement limitations and selection considerations
The material’s figures conflict in three places and all three are carried rather than resolved. The minimum substrate thickness differs between the split probes and the integral model. The body dimensions are given four ways across the range. And the indication error is quoted with three different bases, which turns out to be a difference of calibration procedure rather than a contradiction - but only once the procedure each figure belongs to is attached to it.
There is also a limit the material implies rather than states. It lists coating types - paint, plating, powder, anodising, films - without mapping them to a method, and while most are straightforward, the ones that are not are exactly the ones that go wrong: a magnetic layer on a ferromagnetic substrate, or a conductive layer on a conductive substrate. Where a coating is neither clearly magnetic nor clearly non-magnetic, saying so in the enquiry is what gets it settled.
Ordering
The items that fix the answer are the substrate material and grade, its thickness, and its smallest radius and narrowest area; the coating material and how it is applied, and whether any layer is magnetic; the expected thickness with its tolerance band; whether steel and aluminium parts both have to be inspected, which decides between a single-method instrument and one carrying both; how many readings per part the acceptance criteria require; and whether readings have to be stored, exported or printed. Where the part is small or curved, the geometry decides the probe, so a rough sketch of the part is worth more than a written description. Quantity, destination port and required delivery date complete the enquiry.
Every value below is taken from source documentation. Where a parameter is not stated in the available material it is marked as information required rather than estimated.